Despite ongoing negotiations, Iran has dismissed the notion that a comprehensive agreement with the United States is nearing completion, citing several unresolved issues. Esmail Baghaei, a spokesperson for Iran’s foreign ministry, acknowledged that both parties have reached consensus on numerous points. However, he emphasized that a definitive deal remains elusive, attributing delays to conflicting messages from Washington and Israeli interference.
The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz for commercial shipping remains a central topic in the discussions. Iran has clarified its stance, stating it does not intend to impose tolls on vessels. Instead, it may levy fees for services related to navigation and environmental protection, in collaboration with Oman. Additionally, Iran is firm in its demand that any agreement must encompass a ceasefire in Lebanon and the lifting of restrictions on its ports and shipping operations.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has indicated that the negotiations continue, describing the current proposal as significant. The proposed framework suggests a 30-day period following a ceasefire, during which Iran would undertake the removal of mines from the Strait of Hormuz to restore full maritime access. Concurrently, the US military confirmed strikes in southern Iran, targeting missile sites and boats suspected of preparing mine-laying activities, actions which Washington described as self-defense while supporting ongoing ceasefire efforts.
In the broader context of Middle Eastern diplomacy, President Donald Trump has expressed that the final agreement would either be highly beneficial or there would be no deal at all. He has also encouraged several Middle Eastern nations to join the Abraham Accords to normalize relations with Israel, though reports suggest regional leaders have shown limited enthusiasm for this initiative.
Another complex aspect of the negotiations is Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium. While Tehran has shown some willingness to temporarily reduce enrichment levels, it has firmly opposed the idea of transferring its uranium stockpile abroad. Iran is also seeking the release of billions in frozen assets held overseas. Iranian officials argue that internal political divisions in the US, including criticism from Congress and factions within the Republican Party, are exerting pressure on the White House and further complicating the talks. Notably, the proposed agreement does not address Iran’s ballistic missile program or its support for regional armed groups, making it less comprehensive than previous US demands.